Journal

Save
About the journal

The journal "Customs Law for Practitioners" is published once a month in Lithuanian language for Lithuanian market. The publisher is company CC Learning, UAB

On the platform you will find all the articles published starting from the first issue in November 2012.

Terms and conditions

Responsibility for the content. The information contained in the journal "Customs Law for Practitioners" is for general information purposes only and cannot be construed as legal advice, conclusion or consultation. The publisher CC Learning, UAB does not necessarily agree with the views of the authors of articles.

Distribution. The exclusive right to distribute the journal belongs to CC Learning, UAB. The paid articles of the journal are only for use of those who have acquired them lawfully. The originals or copies of the articles may not be distributed, sold, rented, lent or otherwise transferred without the written consent of CC Learning, UAB.

Contact in case of questions: info@customsclear.net

lt
Payment of interest on returned sums that were unlawfully recovered by the customs authorities in the EU Member States and their assessment by the EU courts
31-05-2022

In business practice, the customs authorities often recover from the traders (business entities) (or sometimes – refuse to pay to these persons) various duties, charges, levies, or sanctions administered by them, even though such recovery or refusing to pay them at the later date may be declared illegal, contrary to the EU law, e.g. by national courts. Accordingly, in such a situation the question arises whether such wrongly recovered and/or paid sums (customs duties, other charges, penalties) administered by the customs authorities in the EU Member States must be repaid together with additionally calculated interest for the period during which the person concerned was unlawfully deprived of the relevant sums of money? The article analyses how such issues should be addressed in the light of recent case law of the European Court of Justice (CJEU).

Dr. Gediminas Valantiejus

duties, taxes, violations
lt
Payment of interest on returned sums that were unlawfully recovered by the customs authorities in the EU Member States and their assessment by the EU courts
31-05-2022

In business practice, the customs authorities often recover from the traders (business entities) (or sometimes – refuse to pay to these persons) various duties, charges, levies, or sanctions administered by them, even though such recovery or refusing to pay them at the later date may be declared illegal, contrary to the EU law, e.g. by national courts. Accordingly, in such a situation the question arises whether such wrongly recovered and/or paid sums (customs duties, other charges, penalties) administered by the customs authorities in the EU Member States must be repaid together with additionally calculated interest for the period during which the person concerned was unlawfully deprived of the relevant sums of money? The article analyses how such issues should be addressed in the light of recent case law of the European Court of Justice (CJEU).

Dr. Gediminas Valantiejus

duties, taxes, violations
lt
Kur pakankamo rūpestingumo klasifikuojant prekes ribos?
29-05-2022

Prekių tarifinis klasifikavimas - sritis, kurioje Lietuvoje dirbančiam deklarantui nesunku „užsidirbti“ administracinę nuobaudą. Nuobaudos būtų galima išvengti, jeigu pavyktų įrodyti, kad buvo klasifikuojama pakankamai rūpestingai. Teismuose vis bandoma išsiaiškinti: kurgi tos rūpestingumo ribos? Apžvelgiame aktualią bylą, kurioje ginčas kilo dėl nuobaudos, skirtos už neteisingą išmaniųjų apyrankių klasifikavimą.

Jurgita Bartninkienė

classification, violations
lt
Kur pakankamo rūpestingumo klasifikuojant prekes ribos?
29-05-2022

Prekių tarifinis klasifikavimas - sritis, kurioje Lietuvoje dirbančiam deklarantui nesunku „užsidirbti“ administracinę nuobaudą. Nuobaudos būtų galima išvengti, jeigu pavyktų įrodyti, kad buvo klasifikuojama pakankamai rūpestingai. Teismuose vis bandoma išsiaiškinti: kurgi tos rūpestingumo ribos? Apžvelgiame aktualią bylą, kurioje ginčas kilo dėl nuobaudos, skirtos už neteisingą išmaniųjų apyrankių klasifikavimą.

Jurgita Bartninkienė

classification, violations
lt
Solidari atsakomybė už skolą muitinei: tai „tik“ muito ar ir kitų mokesčių rizika?
22-05-2022

Atstovas muitinėje gali atstovauti klientą muitinėje tiesiogiai arba netiesiogiai. Pastaruoju atveju atstovas yra solidariai atsakingas už skolą muitinei. Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) aktualiai išnagrinėtoje byloje atsakė į klausimą, ar netiesioginis atstovas solidariai atsako ne tik už muito, bet ir importo PVM sumokėjimą.

Jurgita Stanienė

customs brokers, duties, taxes
lt
Solidari atsakomybė už skolą muitinei: tai „tik“ muito ar ir kitų mokesčių rizika?
22-05-2022

Atstovas muitinėje gali atstovauti klientą muitinėje tiesiogiai arba netiesiogiai. Pastaruoju atveju atstovas yra solidariai atsakingas už skolą muitinei. Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) aktualiai išnagrinėtoje byloje atsakė į klausimą, ar netiesioginis atstovas solidariai atsako ne tik už muito, bet ir importo PVM sumokėjimą.

Jurgita Stanienė

customs brokers, duties, taxes
Forgot password?

* Mandatory fields

By signing up you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Password reset

Check your e-mail, we sent you a link to reset your password.


Login with Google Login with LinkedIn

Contact us

Thank you for report
Maximum file size 6mb
File is too large